Recruitment
Teamtailor integration with Feedback Analytics: candidate feedback that grounds employer brand and hiring in facts
Feedback Analytics captures structured feedback and turns it into insight and follow-up. Teamtailor brings career site, employer brand, and ATS together, where recruiters and talent teams manage pipelines and journeys. Connecting both ties measurements to the same jobs, steps, and campaigns as in Teamtailor, so HR, recruiters, and employer branding attract talent and see where the process strains and which roles or sources deliver the best candidate experience. Feedback, insight, action, beside your brand and hiring stack.
Why this integration
Strong employer brand attracts; competitive advantage comes when the application experience matches. Without structured feedback much stays implicit while Teamtailor shows pipeline, stages, and jobs.
Connecting Feedback Analytics to Teamtailor context, job, step, source, makes candidate experience measurable where teams already work. Teamtailor leads your career site and ATS; Feedback Analytics remains where feedback is captured, analyzed, and turned into reporting and improvement.
What you can do with Feedback Analytics + Teamtailor
Feedback Analytics supplies trusted feedback and logic; Teamtailor supplies job, funnel, and EB context so responses map to roles, steps, and channels.
| Measure candidate experience | Satisfaction and perception after milestones, aligned with GDPR and your tone of voice. |
|---|---|
| Feedback per job or process step | Insights per role or funnel stage so recruitment and hiring managers share the same facts. |
| Spot hiring improvements | Catch friction in speed, communication, or expectations before candidates drop off or share negatively. |
| Report on recruitment quality | Consistent dashboards and exports for QBRs: trends by job, source, region, or team where policy allows. |
| Automate follow-up | Trigger alerts or workflows at thresholds toward recruiter, hiring manager, or EB team. |
| Technical shape | API, webhooks, and ATS integration aligned with your Teamtailor setup. |
Practical use cases
- Career site to application: measure first impression and clarity of the apply flow.
- Per job: CX beside conversion and time-to-hire from Teamtailor.
- Interview rounds: feedback after each round, linked to role and source.
- Employer branding: campaign or event feedback beside applications from the same channel.
- Quality: quarterly recruitment CX trends for leadership.
Who it is for
Recruiters and talent acquisition steering on experience beyond classic ATS KPIs. HR linking hiring quality to policy and people roadmap. Employer branding teams backing the brand with data on the real application experience, not only reach and applies.
How the connection works
Define surveys, logic, dashboards, and webhooks or API access in Feedback Analytics.
Map identifiers and events from Teamtailor, candidates, jobs, stages, sources, so each response is traceable under GDPR and internal hiring rules. Align fields, consent, and retention with legal and IT. Feedback Analytics stays where feedback is captured and turned into action; Teamtailor stays the ATS and career experience where hiring happens.
Why Feedback Analytics as the central feedback layer?
Feedback Analytics is more than a survey tool: collection through action with flows and action lists.
One definition for scores and labels before numbers hit EB reports or leadership reviews, without every campaign getting its own spreadsheet.
Request a demo to align your first use case and field mapping with recruitment, HR, and employer branding.
FAQ
Does Teamtailor replace Feedback Analytics?
No. Teamtailor is your career site and ATS; Feedback Analytics is where feedback is captured and turned into follow-up and reporting.
What about GDPR and candidate data?
Align questions, timing, fields, and retention with your privacy notice and legal basis.
Can we compare feedback per job or source?
Yes if policy and legal allow. Technically it depends on which identifiers you map and export.
API and webhooks or manual only?
Many teams combine ATS integration, API, and webhooks, choose what is stable and auditable.
